The History of the Roosevelt Dime
Reach into your pocket right now, and there is a good chance you are carrying one. It is the most common coin in America — the little silver-coloured dime you have handed over a thousand times without a second thought.
But this ordinary coin was born in grief, rushed into existence in a matter of weeks to meet a dead president's birthday. It was accused, at the height of the Red Scare, of hiding the secret initials of Joseph Stalin. And it may carry a portrait quietly borrowed from a Black woman artist who was never officially credited for one of the most reproduced images in human history.
This is the story of the coin you never look at, and everything hidden in plain sight upon it.
- Years
- 1946–2025
- Mints
- Philadelphia, San Francisco, Denver, West Point
- Designer
- John R. Sinnock
- Composition
- varies
- Metal content
- varies
- Weight
- varies
- Diameter
- 17.9 mm
- Edge
- Reeded
- Coins in series
- 299
A death that stopped the world
On the twelfth of April, 1945, Franklin Delano Roosevelt died.
He had led the United States through the depths of the Great Depression and almost the entire span of the Second World War — four terms, twelve years, longer than any president before or since. To a whole generation of Americans he was simply the president. Many young people had never known another.
When he died, with victory in Europe only weeks away, the nation's grief was overwhelming. The country wanted to honour him immediately. And it knew exactly which coin to use.
Why it had to be the dime
To understand why it had to be the dime — and only the dime — you have to know what dimes already meant.
Roosevelt had been struck down in the prime of his life by polio, a disease that left him unable to walk unaided, a fact he largely kept from the public. But rather than hide from it, he founded a charity to fight it: the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis. And that foundation ran a fundraising campaign built on a brilliant, humble idea — that ordinary Americans could mail in a single dime to fight the disease.
They called it the March of Dimes. Millions of dimes poured into the White House.
The ten-cent coin was already, in the public's heart, Roosevelt's coin — the small change of a national act of compassion. So when he died, there was never any real question.
Twenty-four days
There was a deadline, and it was brutal.
The nation wanted the new coin ready for Roosevelt's birthday, the thirtieth of January 1946 — which was also the launch of that year's March of Dimes campaign. That gave the Mint's chief engraver, John Sinnock, a matter of weeks to design, model and win approval for an entirely new coin.
A fine-arts commission wanted to hold a grand competition among America's greatest sculptors — the very men who had made the Mercury dime and the Buffalo nickel. The Mint director refused. There was no time.
Sinnock's first designs were rejected. He reworked them. The final version was approved on the sixth of January — twenty-four days before the coins had to be in people's hands. The presses at Philadelphia struck the first Roosevelt dimes, and on the thirtieth of January, the late president's birthday, they entered circulation.
A coin born of mourning, delivered almost impossibly fast.
Torch, olive, oak
The design itself is quiet and dignified. Roosevelt's profile faces left. On the back, three simple symbols that sum up the man: a torch for liberty, an olive branch for peace, and an oak branch for strength and victory — the war he did not live to see won.
It should have been uncontroversial. It was anything but.
The initials that started a Cold War rumour
Almost the instant the dime hit the streets, America went looking for a conspiracy — and found one that was not there.
Down at the base of Roosevelt's neck sat two small letters: JS. They were, of course, the initials of the designer, John Sinnock — exactly the kind of quiet signature engravers had been placing on coins for centuries.
But this was 1946. The war was over, the Cold War was beginning, and a newly frightened nation was starting to imagine communists behind every tree. A rumour caught fire and spread from town to town: that the JS was not John Sinnock at all. It was Joseph Stalin. The story claimed a Soviet agent had infiltrated the United States Mint and stamped the dictator's initials onto American money.
It is, of course, nonsense. There was no agent and no plot — just an engraver's ordinary initials in the ordinary place engravers put them. But here is how deep the paranoia of that era ran: enough Americans genuinely believed it, and were genuinely alarmed, that the United States Mint was forced to issue an official public statement solemnly explaining that JS stood for John Sinnock, and that no, there were no Reds hiding in its walls.
The rumour did not die easily. It persisted for years, well into the McCarthy era. To this day nobody has ever traced where the Stalin story started. It was pure Cold War anxiety, projected onto ten cents of silver.
The question of Selma Burke
That story is the famous one, and the fun one. There is a second controversy attached to this coin, and it is more serious, more unresolved, and it deserves to be told with care.
Her name was Selma Burke. She was a Black sculptor, a daughter of North Carolina, an artist who had come up through the Harlem Renaissance. In 1943 and 1944 she won a commission to create a bronze portrait relief of President Roosevelt for a government building in Washington. To do it properly she managed something remarkable — she got the sitting president himself to pose for her, in person, at the White House. She studied him from life. She completed a strong, dignified profile, and it was unveiled in Washington in September of 1945, months before Sinnock's dime was designed.
When the dime appeared, people who had seen Burke's plaque noticed something. The resemblance was striking.
Selma Burke herself believed, for the rest of her life, that Sinnock had based the dime's portrait on her work. Roosevelt's own son later said he believed Burke's relief had influenced the coin. The Roosevelt Presidential Library has echoed that belief.
The official record has never been rewritten. Sinnock remains the credited designer, and it cannot be proven conclusively that he copied her. But it is more than plausible, and it fits a painful, recurring pattern in American art, where the contributions of Black artists were quietly absorbed and left uncredited.
Burke went on to a long and celebrated career, and she never stopped telling people that the face on the dime in their pocket — one of the most reproduced portraits in the history of the world — was hers. Whether or not it can be proven in a court, her story deserves to be spoken every time this coin's history is told.
The silver line
For all that drama, the dime settled into being the great workhorse of American change, struck by the billions.
But it carries the same hidden treasure that runs through so many American coins of its era. From 1946 all the way through 1964, the Roosevelt dime was struck in ninety percent silver. Then, in 1965, as silver prices climbed and the metal vanished from the nation's coinage, the silver was stripped out and replaced with the copper-nickel clad we carry today.
And so the dime, like the quarter and the half dollar of its time, became a small dividing line in American history. A 1964 dime is real silver. A 1965 dime, identical to the eye, is not. The change is invisible — you have to read the date.
Which means that to this day, the single most common coin in America is worth checking, because every so often, tucked in a jar of pocket change or a roll from the bank, one of them turns out to be silver.
Full Bands
There is one more quiet thing about this coin worth knowing.
Look closely at the torch on the reverse, at the horizontal bands wrapped around its middle. On a coin struck with full force from a fresh die, those bands are cleanly and completely separated. Collectors call it Full Bands — and if you read a different holder, Full Torch, which is the same thing under another grading service's name.
It is the same kind of tiny perfection prized as Full Steps on the Jefferson nickel, or sharp bands on a Mercury dime: the difference between an ordinary coin and a treasured one, hiding in a detail most people will never notice.
The letters that went missing
Because the Roosevelt dime was struck in such enormous numbers for so long, its rarities are rarely rarities of date. They are rarities of accident.
Every so often a working die reached the press without its mint mark — the small letter that says where the coin was struck. On a circulating coin that mistake might pass unremarked. On a proof coin, made deliberately and carefully for collectors, it is unmistakable, and the handful that escaped are among the most sought-after modern American coins. The same kind of omission happened once on a circulation strike from Philadelphia, and collectors have been picking through that year's dimes ever since.
They are worth knowing about not because they are valuable, but because they are the opposite of everything else in this story: a coin defined not by what it carries, but by what it is missing.
Why it matters
So the next time a dime lands in your palm — that small, forgettable, everyday coin — hold it a second longer.
It was born from a nation's grief in a matter of weeks, to reach a dead president's birthday in time. It carries a torch of liberty, an olive branch of peace, and the memory of a man who fought a disease from a wheelchair and asked a country to mail in its spare change to help. It survived a Cold War rumour that it hid the mark of Stalin. It may quietly carry the uncredited artistry of a Black woman who studied Roosevelt's face in person. And now and then, it is secretly made of silver.
That is the Roosevelt dime — proof that even the smallest, most overlooked coin in America can hold a whole nation's history in its tiny, glinting face.
Key dates
| Coin | Mintage |
|---|---|
| 1949-S Lowest-mintage San Francisco issue of the silver years. | 13,500,000 |
| 1955 Lowest mintage of the silver era. | 12,800,000 |
| 1996-W-P Struck only for the fiftieth-anniversary mint sets and never released into circulation. | 1,457,949 |
Better dates
| Coin | Mintage |
|---|---|
| 1949 Better early date. | 30,900,000 |
| 1949-D Better early Denver issue. | 26,000,000 |
| 1950-S Lower-mintage San Francisco issue. | 20,400,000 |
| 1951-S Lower-mintage San Francisco issue. | 31,600,000 |
| 1955-D From the lowest-mintage year of the silver era. | 14,000,000 |
| 1955-S From the lowest-mintage year of the silver era. | 18,500,000 |
Every Roosevelt Dime
Every coin links to its own page — full specifications and, where market listings have been observed, a grade-by-grade price guide.
| Coin | Mint | Mintage |
|---|---|---|
| 1946 | Philadelphia | 255,300,000 |
| 1946-D | Denver | 61,000,000 |
| 1946-S | San Francisco | 27,900,000 |
| 1947 | Philadelphia | 121,500,000 |
| 1947-D | Denver | 46,800,000 |
| 1947-S | San Francisco | 34,800,000 |
| 1948 | Philadelphia | 75,000,000 |
| 1948-D | Denver | 52,800,000 |
| 1948-S | San Francisco | 35,500,000 |
| 1949 | Philadelphia | 30,900,000 |
| 1949-D | Denver | 26,000,000 |
| 1949-S | San Francisco | 13,500,000 |
| 1950 | Philadelphia | 50,200,000 |
| 1950 Proof | Philadelphia | 51,386 |
| 1950-D | Denver | 46,800,000 |
| 1950-S | San Francisco | 20,400,000 |
| 1951 | Philadelphia | 103,900,000 |
| 1951 Proof | Philadelphia | 57,500 |
| 1951-D | Denver | 52,200,000 |
| 1951-S | San Francisco | 31,600,000 |
| 1952 | Philadelphia | 99,100,000 |
| 1952 Proof | Philadelphia | 81,980 |
| 1952-D | Denver | 122,100,000 |
| 1952-S | San Francisco | 44,400,000 |
| 1953 | Philadelphia | 53,600,000 |
| 1953 Proof | Philadelphia | 128,800 |
| 1953-D | Denver | 136,400,000 |
| 1953-S | San Francisco | 39,200,000 |
| 1954 | Philadelphia | 114,200,000 |
| 1954 Proof | Philadelphia | 233,300 |
| 1954-D | Denver | 106,400,000 |
| 1954-S | San Francisco | 22,900,000 |
| 1955 | Philadelphia | 12,800,000 |
| 1955 Proof | Philadelphia | 378,200 |
| 1955-D | Denver | 14,000,000 |
| 1955-S | San Francisco | 18,500,000 |
| 1956 | Philadelphia | 109,300,000 |
| 1956 Proof | Philadelphia | 669,384 |
| 1956-D | Denver | 108,000,000 |
| 1957 | Philadelphia | 161,400,000 |
| 1957 Proof | Philadelphia | 1,247,952 |
| 1957-D | Denver | 113,800,000 |
| 1958 | Philadelphia | 32,700,000 |
| 1958 Proof | Philadelphia | 875,652 |
| 1958-D | Denver | 137,000,000 |
| 1959 | Philadelphia | 86,900,000 |
| 1959 Proof | Philadelphia | 1,149,291 |
| 1959-D | Denver | 164,900,000 |
| 1960 | Philadelphia | 72,100,000 |
| 1960 Proof | Philadelphia | 1,691,602 |
| 1960-D | Denver | 200,200,000 |
| 1961 | Philadelphia | 96,800,000 |
| 1961 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,028,244 |
| 1961-D | Denver | 209,100,000 |
| 1962 | Philadelphia | 75,700,000 |
| 1962 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,218,019 |
| 1962-D | Denver | 334,900,000 |
| 1963 | Philadelphia | 123,650,000 |
| 1963 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,075,645 |
| 1963-D | Denver | 421,476,530 |
| 1964 | Philadelphia | 929,360,000 |
| 1964 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,950,762 |
| 1964-D | Denver | 1,357,517,180 |
| 1965 | Philadelphia | 1,652,140,570 |
| 1966 | Philadelphia | 1,382,734,540 |
| 1967 | Philadelphia | 2,244,007,320 |
| 1968 | Philadelphia | 424,470,000 |
| 1968-D | Denver | 480,748,280 |
| 1968-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,041,506 |
| 1969 | Philadelphia | 145,790,000 |
| 1969-D | Denver | 563,323,870 |
| 1969-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,934,631 |
| 1970 | Philadelphia | 345,570,000 |
| 1970-D | Denver | 754,942,100 |
| 1970-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,632,810 |
| 1971 | Philadelphia | 162,690,000 |
| 1971-D | Denver | 377,914,240 |
| 1971-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,220,733 |
| 1972 | Philadelphia | 431,540,000 |
| 1972-D | Denver | 330,290,000 |
| 1972-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,260,996 |
| 1973 | Philadelphia | 315,670,000 |
| 1973-D | Denver | 455,032,426 |
| 1973-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,760,339 |
| 1974 | Philadelphia | 470,248,000 |
| 1974-D | Denver | 571,083,000 |
| 1974-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,612,568 |
| 1975 | Philadelphia | 585,673,900 |
| 1975-D | Denver | 313,705,300 |
| 1975-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,845,450 |
| 1976 | Philadelphia | 568,760,000 |
| 1976-D | Denver | 695,222,774 |
| 1976-S Proof | San Francisco | 4,149,730 |
| 1977 | Philadelphia | 796,930,000 |
| 1977-D | Denver | 376,607,228 |
| 1977-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,251,152 |
| 1978 | Philadelphia | 663,980,000 |
| 1978-D | Denver | 282,847,540 |
| 1978-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,127,781 |
| 1979-P | Philadelphia | 315,440,000 |
| 1979-D | Denver | 390,921,184 |
| 1979-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,677,175 |
| 1980-P | Philadelphia | 735,170,000 |
| 1980-D | Denver | 719,354,321 |
| 1980-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,554,806 |
| 1981-P | Philadelphia | 676,650,000 |
| 1981-D | Denver | 712,284,143 |
| 1981-S Proof | San Francisco | 4,063,083 |
| 1982-P | Philadelphia | 519,475,000 |
| 1982-D | Denver | 542,713,584 |
| 1982-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,857,479 |
| 1983-P | Philadelphia | 647,025,000 |
| 1983-D | Denver | 730,129,224 |
| 1983-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,279,126 |
| 1984-P | Philadelphia | 856,669,000 |
| 1984-D | Denver | 704,803,976 |
| 1984-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,065,110 |
| 1985-P | Philadelphia | 705,200,962 |
| 1985-D | Denver | 587,979,970 |
| 1985-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,362,821 |
| 1986-P | Philadelphia | 682,649,970 |
| 1986-D | Denver | 473,326,970 |
| 1986-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,010,497 |
| 1987-P | Philadelphia | 762,709,481 |
| 1987-D | Denver | 653,203,402 |
| 1987-S Proof | San Francisco | 4,227,728 |
| 1988-P | Philadelphia | 1,030,550,000 |
| 1988-D | Denver | 962,385,489 |
| 1988-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,262,948 |
| 1989-P | Philadelphia | 1,298,400,000 |
| 1989-D | Denver | 896,535,597 |
| 1989-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,220,194 |
| 1990-P | Philadelphia | 1,034,340,000 |
| 1990-D | Denver | 839,995,824 |
| 1990-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,299,559 |
| 1991-P | Philadelphia | 927,220,000 |
| 1991-D | Denver | 601,241,114 |
| 1991-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,867,787 |
| 1992-P | Philadelphia | 593,500,000 |
| 1992-D | Denver | 616,273,932 |
| 1992-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,858,981 |
| 1992-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 1,317,579 |
| 1993-P | Philadelphia | 766,180,000 |
| 1993-D | Denver | 750,110,166 |
| 1993-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,633,439 |
| 1993-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 761,353 |
| 1994-P | Philadelphia | 1,189,000,000 |
| 1994-D | Denver | 1,303,268,110 |
| 1994-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,484,594 |
| 1994-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 785,329 |
| 1995-P | Philadelphia | 1,125,500,000 |
| 1995-D | Denver | 1,274,890,000 |
| 1995-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,010,384 |
| 1995-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 838,953 |
| 1996-P | Philadelphia | 1,421,163,000 |
| 1996-W-P | West Point | 1,457,949 |
| 1996-D | Denver | 1,400,300,000 |
| 1996-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 1,750,244 |
| 1996-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 775,021 |
| 1997-P | Philadelphia | 991,640,000 |
| 1997-D | Denver | 979,810,000 |
| 1997-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | — |
| 1997-S Proof | San Francisco | 741,678 |
| 1997-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 741,678 |
| 1998-P | Philadelphia | 1,163,000,000 |
| 1998-D | Denver | 1,172,250,000 |
| 1998-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,086,507 |
| 1998-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 878,792 |
| 1999-P | Philadelphia | 2,164,000,000 |
| 1999-D | Denver | 1,397,750,000 |
| 1999-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | — |
| 1999-S Proof | San Francisco | 804,565 |
| 1999-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 804,565 |
| 2000-P | Philadelphia | 1,842,500,000 |
| 2000-D | Denver | 1,818,700,000 |
| 2000-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 3,082,572 |
| 2000-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 965,421 |
| 2001-P | Philadelphia | 1,369,590,000 |
| 2001-D | Denver | 1,412,800,000 |
| 2001-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | — |
| 2001-S Proof | San Francisco | 889,697 |
| 2001-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 889,697 |
| 2002-P | Philadelphia | 1,187,500,000 |
| 2002-D | Denver | 1,379,500,000 |
| 2002-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,319,766 |
| 2002-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 892,229 |
| 2003-P | Philadelphia | 1,085,500,000 |
| 2003-D | Denver | 986,500,000 |
| 2003-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,172,684 |
| 2003-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 1,125,755 |
| 2004-P | Philadelphia | 1,328,000,000 |
| 2004-D | Denver | 1,159,500,000 |
| 2004-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 1,175,934 |
| 2004-S Proof | San Francisco | 1,175,934 |
| 2004-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 1,175,934 |
| 2005-P | Philadelphia | 1,412,000,000 |
| 2005-D | Denver | 1,423,500,000 |
| 2005-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,275,000 |
| 2005-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 1,069,679 |
| 2006-P | Philadelphia | 1,381,000,000 |
| 2006-D | Denver | 1,447,000,000 |
| 2006-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,000,428 |
| 2006-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 1,054,008 |
| 2007-P | Philadelphia | 995,000,000 |
| 2007-D | Denver | 1,012,000,000 |
| 2007-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 1,702,116 |
| 2007-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 875,050 |
| 2008-P | Philadelphia | 413,000,000 |
| 2008-D | Denver | 637,500,000 |
| 2008-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 1,405,674 |
| 2008-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 763,887 |
| 2009-P | Philadelphia | 96,500,000 |
| 2009-D | Denver | 49,500,000 |
| 2009-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 1,477,967 |
| 2009-S Proof | San Francisco | 1,477,967 |
| 2009-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 2010-P | Philadelphia | 557,000,000 |
| 2010-D | Denver | 562,000,000 |
| 2010-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 1,130,815 |
| 2010-S Proof | San Francisco | 1,130,815 |
| 2010-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 2011-P | Philadelphia | 748,000,000 |
| 2011-D | Denver | 754,000,000 |
| 2011-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 1,098,835 |
| 2011-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 574,175 |
| 2012-P | Philadelphia | 519,000,000 |
| 2012-D | Denver | 539,500,000 |
| 2012-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 841,972 |
| 2012-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 395,443 |
| 2013-P | Philadelphia | 1,086,500,000 |
| 2013-D | Denver | 1,025,500,000 |
| 2013-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 802,460 |
| 2013-S Proof | San Francisco | 802,460 |
| 2013-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 2014-P | Philadelphia | 1,125,500,000 |
| 2014-D | Denver | 1,177,000,000 |
| 2014-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 665,100 |
| 2014-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 343,037 |
| 2015-P | Philadelphia | 1,497,510,000 |
| 2015-W-W Proof SILVER | West Point | 74,430 |
| 2015-D | Denver | 1,543,500,000 |
| 2015-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 669,960 |
| 2015-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 352,450 |
| 2016-P | Philadelphia | 1,517,000,000 |
| 2016-D | Denver | 1,437,000,000 |
| 2016-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | — |
| 2016-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2016-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 2017-P | Philadelphia | 1,437,500,000 |
| 2017-D | Denver | 1,290,500,000 |
| 2017-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | — |
| 2017-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2017-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 2018-P | Philadelphia | 1,193,000,000 |
| 2018-D | Denver | 1,006,000,000 |
| 2018-S Proof Clad | San Francisco | — |
| 2018-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2018-S Proof Silver | San Francisco | — |
| 2019-P | Philadelphia | 1,147,500,000 |
| 2019-D | Denver | 1,001,500,000 |
| 2019-S Proof Clad | San Francisco | — |
| 2019-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2019-S Proof Silver | San Francisco | — |
| 2020-P | Philadelphia | 1,247,500,000 |
| 2020-D | Denver | 1,294,000,000 |
| 2020-S Proof Clad | San Francisco | — |
| 2020-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2020-S Proof Silver | San Francisco | — |
| 2021-P | Philadelphia | 987,000,000 |
| 2021-D | Denver | 1,066,500,000 |
| 2021-S Proof Clad | San Francisco | — |
| 2021-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2021-S Proof Silver Limited Edition Set | San Francisco | — |
| 2021-S Proof Silver | San Francisco | — |
| 2022-P | Philadelphia | 1,551,000,000 |
| 2022-D | Denver | 1,583,000,000 |
| 2022-S Proof Clad | San Francisco | — |
| 2022-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2022-S Proof Silver Limited Edition Set | San Francisco | — |
| 2022-S Proof Silver | San Francisco | — |
| 2023-P | Philadelphia | 1,410,500,000 |
| 2023-D | Denver | 1,295,000,000 |
| 2023-S Proof Clad | San Francisco | — |
| 2023-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2023-S Proof Silver Limited Edition Set | San Francisco | — |
| 2023-S Proof Silver | San Francisco | — |
| 2024-P | Philadelphia | 307,000,000 |
| 2024-D | Denver | 248,000,000 |
| 2024-S Proof Clad | San Francisco | — |
| 2024-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2024-S Proof Silver Limited Edition Set | San Francisco | — |
| 2024-S Proof Silver | San Francisco | — |
| 2025-P | Philadelphia | 580,000,000 |
| 2025-D | Denver | 685,500,000 |
| 2025-S Proof Clad | San Francisco | — |
| 2025-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2025-S Proof Silver Advance Releases | San Francisco | — |
| 2025-S Proof Silver Limited Edition Set | San Francisco | — |
| 2025-S Proof Silver | San Francisco | — |