The History of the Washington Quarter
She won the competition. Not once — twice. The most respected art commission in the country looked at her design and declared it the best, and then declared it the best again.
And still, one powerful man overruled her and handed the job to someone else. Her design was locked away, and she went to her grave never seeing it on the coin it was made for. It would take ninety years — nearly a century, long after everyone involved was dead — for America to finally put her work where it always belonged.
Her name was Laura Gardin Fraser. This is the story of the coin in every American's pocket, and the woman who was cheated out of it.
- Years
- 1932, 1934–1974, 1976–1998
- Mints
- Philadelphia, San Francisco, Denver
- Designer
- John Flanagan
- Composition
- 90% silver -> clad 1965
- Metal content
- varies
- Weight
- varies
- Diameter
- 24.3 mm
- Edge
- Reeded
- Coins in series
- 212
A birthday, and a change of plan
It starts with a birthday, and a very big one.
The year 1932 marked two hundred years since the birth of George Washington. The nation wanted to celebrate, and Congress wanted to mark the moment on its money. The original plan was not even for a quarter — it was going to be a commemorative half dollar, a one-year tribute.
But plans shifted, and the decision was made instead to permanently redesign the quarter, replacing the Standing Liberty quarter that had run since 1916, and putting the first president's face on it. He has remained there ever since.
The mask on a living man's face
There was one firm rule for the design. Every artist entering the competition had to base their portrait of Washington on the same source — and it is a wonderful piece of history.
In 1785, a French sculptor named Jean-Antoine Houdon travelled to Mount Vernon, at the urging of Benjamin Franklin, and made a life mask of the living George Washington — pressing plaster directly onto the face of the real man to capture his exact features. That bust is considered the most accurate likeness of Washington that exists: not a painter's flattering imagination, but the actual contours of his face.
So the Washington on your quarter traces directly back to a mould taken from the living president's own skin. When you look at that profile, you are, in a real sense, looking at the true face of George Washington.
The man who refused to be on money
There is a deep irony in that face being on a coin at all — one Washington himself would have found hard to swallow.
In his own lifetime, he refused to appear on American money. When Congress was writing the very first Coinage Act in 1792, an early version of the bill called for the sitting president's portrait to be placed on the nation's coins. Washington rejected it. To him, a ruler's face stamped on the money was the mark of a monarchy — exactly the thing America had just fought a revolution to escape.
He had spent eight years at war with the armies of King George the Third. The last thing he wanted was his own head on a coin like some king or Roman emperor. His ally James Madison argued the provision out of the bill as fundamentally un-republican, and the final law instead required that American coins bear an image emblematic of Liberty — a symbol, never a leader. British minters had even struck sample Washington cents bearing his portrait, hoping to win the contract to make America's money. Washington turned them down flat.
And so here is the irony folded into every quarter: the one founding father who most adamantly refused to be on American money became, a century after his death, the single most reproduced face in it. The man who kept himself off the money to prove America was no monarchy is now the most common face in the entire currency.
The competition
Among the artists who entered was Laura Gardin Fraser, and she was no unknown.
She was one of the most accomplished coin and medal sculptors in America, the designer of celebrated commemorative coins, an artist at the top of her craft. She also happened to be married to James Earle Fraser — and if that name sounds familiar it should, because James Earle Fraser designed the Buffalo nickel. This was, quite literally, the first family of American coin design.
When the judges of the United States Commission of Fine Arts reviewed the entries, they chose Laura Gardin Fraser's design as the winner. Her Washington was strong, dignified, beautifully modelled.
One stubborn man
But there was a man standing between her and the coin: the Secretary of the Treasury, Andrew Mellon.
Mellon was one of the richest men in America — a banker, an industrialist, a titanic art collector, and by many accounts deeply stubborn. For reasons that have been debated ever since, he simply did not want Fraser's design. He preferred the work of a different sculptor, a New York medallist named John Flanagan.
The Fine Arts Commission pushed back and recommended Fraser again. Mellon, placating them, called for a second review — and the Commission chose Fraser a second time. Twice the experts declared her the winner. Twice Mellon overruled them.
Why? No one can say for certain, and that uncertainty is part of the coin's story. Some point to simple stubbornness, a wealthy man used to getting his way. Others have long suspected something uglier: that Mellon, a man of his era, did not want a woman's name on the nation's quarter.
Whatever the true reason, the outcome was fixed. When the first Washington quarters were released on the first of August, 1932, they bore John Flanagan's portrait — the one we still carry today — while Fraser's twice-chosen design was quietly set aside.
To be fair to Flanagan, his work has its own quiet lineage. He had studied under Augustus Saint-Gaudens, the master behind the most beautiful gold coins America ever struck. His Washington is competent and enduring. But the sting of what happened to Laura Fraser never faded from the story — and history was not finished with her.
The first year, and its two scarcities
The coin went out into the world in the depths of the Great Depression, and that is written into its very first year.
Philadelphia struck the new quarter in quantity. The branch mints did not. Demand for coinage had collapsed, banks were failing, and there was simply no call for more quarters — so the Denver and San Francisco issues of 1932 were struck in tiny numbers by the standards of a circulating coin, and then the denomination was not struck at all in 1933.
It is one of those cases where a coin's rarity is not a mint's decision or a collector's contrivance. It is economic history, recorded in metal.
Silver to clad
For its first three decades, from 1932 through 1964, the Washington quarter was struck in ninety percent silver.
Then it hit the same wall that every American coin of that era ran into. By the mid-1960s the price of silver had climbed so high that the metal in the coins was becoming worth more than the coins themselves, and Americans began hoarding them by the roll. The government's response was the Coinage Act of 1965, which stripped the silver out. From 1965 on, the quarter became what it is now — a clad sandwich, a core of pure copper wrapped in layers of copper-nickel.
The dividing line runs invisibly between two years, and it is why silver Washington quarters are still hunted through pocket change and bank rolls today.
The drummer boy, and the year that does not exist
Then came another birthday, and one of the most beloved quarters ever made.
As America approached its two-hundredth birthday, the Mint decided to celebrate the Bicentennial by temporarily changing the backs of the quarter, half dollar and dollar. A public competition was held for the quarter's new reverse, and the winner was a design showing a colonial drummer boy — a young Revolutionary War drummer, ringed by a victory torch and thirteen stars.
Every one of these coins carries a small detail people love to discover: the dual date, 1776–1976.
And here is the quirk that trips up collectors to this day — there is no such thing as a 1975 quarter. None were made. The Mint jumped straight from 1974 into producing the dual-dated Bicentennial coins, so for one year the ordinary date simply does not exist. Nearly two billion of the drummer-boy quarters were struck, which means they are still extremely common in change. An American can quite easily find, in their spare quarters, a little piece of the nation's 200th birthday.
The quiet years
After the Bicentennial the quarter settled back into being the most anonymous coin in America — struck in enormous numbers, spent without a glance, and largely ignored by collectors for two decades.
That inattention is itself worth knowing about. Coins nobody saves in quantity, in years nobody thought were special, can be surprisingly hard to find today in genuinely pristine condition, because almost none were set aside. The interest is not in the date. It is in the condition, and in how few people were paying attention at the time.
Ninety years later
For decades, Laura Gardin Fraser's rejected design sat in history's drawer. In 1999 it was dusted off and used on a commemorative five-dollar gold coin — a small, belated nod.
The real justice came later. In 2022 — ninety years after she first submitted it, ninety years after Andrew Mellon overruled the experts and pushed her aside — the United States Mint finally placed Laura Gardin Fraser's portrait of George Washington on the circulating quarter, as the face of a new series honouring American women.
The design that was twice chosen and twice denied, the work of a woman some believe was rejected simply for being a woman, now sits on the quarter honouring women's contributions to the country. She never lived to see it. But America got there in the end.
Why it matters
So the next time a quarter drops into your hand, look at that familiar profile.
It traces back to a mask pressed onto the face of the living president himself. It belongs to the one founding father who refused to be on money at all. It rode through the end of silver coinage in America and marked the nation's 200th birthday with a drummer boy and a date that skips a year.
And it carries, folded quietly into its history, the story of Laura Gardin Fraser — the artist who won and won again, who was denied by one stubborn man, and who finally, ninety years later, took her rightful place on the most common coin in America.
That is the Washington quarter: a coin of the father of the country, and of the woman who waited a century for justice.
Key dates
| Coin | Mintage |
|---|---|
| 1932-D One of the two major Washington quarter keys; only 436,800 minted. | 436,800 |
| 1932-S The lowest-mintage regular Washington quarter, with only 408,000 struck; one of the principal keys to the series. | 408,000 |
Better dates
| Coin | Mintage |
|---|---|
| 1932 First-year Washington quarter; widely collected and historically important. | 5,404,000 |
| 1934-D Better early Denver issue with a relatively low mintage. | 3,527,200 |
| 1935-D Better early Denver date. | 5,780,000 |
| 1935-S Scarcer early San Francisco issue. | 5,660,000 |
| 1936-D Low-mintage Denver issue and one of the better early Washington quarters. | 5,374,000 |
| 1936-S Better San Francisco issue. | 3,828,000 |
| 1937-S Lower-mintage San Francisco date. | 1,652,000 |
| 1938 Low-mintage Philadelphia issue and a better early date. | 9,480,045 |
| 1938-S Low-mintage San Francisco issue and a strong semi-key. | 2,832,000 |
| 1939-S Better early S-mint date. | 2,628,000 |
| 1940-D Lower-mintage Denver issue. | 2,797,600 |
| 1940-S Better San Francisco date. | 8,244,000 |
| 1942-S Lower-mintage wartime San Francisco issue. | 19,384,000 |
| 1943-S Better wartime S-mint date. | 21,700,000 |
| 1950-D Better Denver issue and a popular date among silver Washington quarter collectors. | 21,075,600 |
| 1955-D Lowest-mintage Washington quarter of the 1950s and a traditional better date. | 3,182,400 |
Every Washington Quarter
Every coin links to its own page — full specifications and, where market listings have been observed, a grade-by-grade price guide.
| Coin | Mint | Mintage |
|---|---|---|
| 1932 | Philadelphia | 5,404,000 |
| 1932-D | Denver | 436,800 |
| 1932-S | San Francisco | 408,000 |
| 1934 | Philadelphia | 31,912,052 |
| 1934-D | Denver | 3,527,200 |
| 1935 | Philadelphia | 32,484,000 |
| 1935-D | Denver | 5,780,000 |
| 1935-S | San Francisco | 5,660,000 |
| 1936 | Philadelphia | 41,303,837 |
| 1936 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,837 |
| 1936-D | Denver | 5,374,000 |
| 1936-S | San Francisco | 3,828,000 |
| 1937 | Philadelphia | 19,701,542 |
| 1937 Proof | Philadelphia | 5,542 |
| 1937-D | Denver | 7,189,600 |
| 1937-S | San Francisco | 1,652,000 |
| 1938 | Philadelphia | 9,480,045 |
| 1938 Proof | Philadelphia | 8,045 |
| 1938-S | San Francisco | 2,832,000 |
| 1939 | Philadelphia | 33,548,795 |
| 1939 Proof | Philadelphia | 8,795 |
| 1939-D | Denver | 7,092,000 |
| 1939-S | San Francisco | 2,628,000 |
| 1940 | Philadelphia | 35,715,246 |
| 1940 Proof | Philadelphia | 11,246 |
| 1940-D | Denver | 2,797,600 |
| 1940-S | San Francisco | 8,244,000 |
| 1941 | Philadelphia | 79,047,287 |
| 1941 Proof | Philadelphia | 15,287 |
| 1941-D | Denver | 16,714,800 |
| 1941-S | San Francisco | 16,080,000 |
| 1942-P | Philadelphia | 102,117,123 |
| 1942-P Proof | Philadelphia | 21,123 |
| 1942-D | Denver | 17,487,200 |
| 1942-S | San Francisco | 19,384,000 |
| 1943-P | Philadelphia | 99,700,000 |
| 1943-D | Denver | 16,095,600 |
| 1943-S | San Francisco | 21,700,000 |
| 1944-P | Philadelphia | 104,956,000 |
| 1944-D | Denver | 14,600,800 |
| 1944-S | San Francisco | 12,560,000 |
| 1945-P | Philadelphia | 74,372,000 |
| 1945-D | Denver | 12,341,600 |
| 1945-S | San Francisco | 17,004,001 |
| 1946 | Philadelphia | 53,436,000 |
| 1946-D | Denver | 9,072,800 |
| 1946-S | San Francisco | 4,204,000 |
| 1947 | Philadelphia | 22,556,000 |
| 1947-D | Denver | 15,338,400 |
| 1947-S | San Francisco | 5,532,000 |
| 1948 | Philadelphia | 35,196,000 |
| 1948-D | Denver | 16,766,800 |
| 1948-S | San Francisco | 15,960,000 |
| 1949 | Philadelphia | 9,312,000 |
| 1949-D | Denver | 10,068,400 |
| 1950 | Philadelphia | 24,971,512 |
| 1950 Proof | Philadelphia | 51,386 |
| 1950-D | Denver | 21,075,600 |
| 1950-S | San Francisco | 10,284,004 |
| 1951 | Philadelphia | 43,505,602 |
| 1951 Proof | Philadelphia | 57,500 |
| 1951-D | Denver | 35,354,800 |
| 1951-S | San Francisco | 9,048,000 |
| 1952 | Philadelphia | 38,862,073 |
| 1952 Proof | Philadelphia | 81,980 |
| 1952-D | Denver | 49,795,200 |
| 1952-S | San Francisco | 13,707,800 |
| 1953 | Philadelphia | 18,664,920 |
| 1953 Proof | Philadelphia | 128,800 |
| 1953-D | Denver | 56,112,400 |
| 1953-S | San Francisco | 14,016,000 |
| 1954 | Philadelphia | 54,645,503 |
| 1954 Proof | Philadelphia | 233,300 |
| 1954-D | Denver | 42,305,500 |
| 1954-S | San Francisco | 11,834,722 |
| 1955 | Philadelphia | 18,558,381 |
| 1955 Proof | Philadelphia | 378,200 |
| 1955-D | Denver | 3,182,400 |
| 1956 | Philadelphia | 44,813,384 |
| 1956 Proof | Philadelphia | 669,384 |
| 1956-D | Denver | 32,334,500 |
| 1957 | Philadelphia | 47,779,952 |
| 1957 Proof | Philadelphia | 1,247,952 |
| 1957-D | Denver | 77,924,160 |
| 1958 | Philadelphia | 7,235,652 |
| 1958 Proof | Philadelphia | 875,652 |
| 1958-D | Denver | 78,124,900 |
| 1959 | Philadelphia | 25,533,291 |
| 1959 Proof | Philadelphia | 1,149,291 |
| 1959-D | Denver | 62,054,232 |
| 1960 | Philadelphia | 30,855,602 |
| 1960 Proof | Philadelphia | 1,691,602 |
| 1960-D | Denver | 63,000,324 |
| 1961 | Philadelphia | 40,064,244 |
| 1961 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,028,244 |
| 1961-D | Denver | 83,656,928 |
| 1962 | Philadelphia | 39,374,019 |
| 1962 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,218,019 |
| 1962-D | Denver | 127,554,756 |
| 1963 | Philadelphia | 77,391,645 |
| 1963 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,075,645 |
| 1963-D | Denver | 135,288,184 |
| 1964 | Philadelphia | 564,341,347 |
| 1964 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,950,762 |
| 1964-D | Denver | 704,135,528 |
| 1965 | Philadelphia | 1,819,717,540 |
| 1966 | Philadelphia | 821,101,500 |
| 1967 | Philadelphia | 1,524,031,848 |
| 1968 | Philadelphia | 220,731,500 |
| 1968-D | Denver | 101,534,000 |
| 1968-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,041,506 |
| 1969 | Philadelphia | 176,212,000 |
| 1969-D | Denver | 114,372,000 |
| 1969-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,934,631 |
| 1970 | Philadelphia | 136,420,000 |
| 1970-D | Denver | 417,341,364 |
| 1970-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,632,810 |
| 1971 | Philadelphia | 109,284,000 |
| 1971-D | Denver | 258,634,428 |
| 1971-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,220,733 |
| 1972 | Philadelphia | 215,048,000 |
| 1972-D | Denver | 311,067,732 |
| 1972-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,260,996 |
| 1973 | Philadelphia | 346,924,000 |
| 1973-D | Denver | 232,977,400 |
| 1973-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,760,339 |
| 1974 | Philadelphia | 801,456,000 |
| 1974-D | Denver | 353,160,300 |
| 1974-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,612,568 |
| 1976 | Philadelphia | 809,784,016 |
| 1976-D | Denver | 860,118,839 |
| 1976-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 7,059,099 |
| 1976-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 1977 | Philadelphia | 468,556,000 |
| 1977-D | Denver | 256,524,978 |
| 1977-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,251,152 |
| 1978 | Philadelphia | 521,452,000 |
| 1978-D | Denver | 287,373,152 |
| 1978-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,127,781 |
| 1979-P | Philadelphia | 515,708,000 |
| 1979-D | Denver | 489,789,780 |
| 1979-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,677,175 |
| 1980-P | Philadelphia | 635,832,000 |
| 1980-D | Denver | 518,327,487 |
| 1980-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,554,806 |
| 1981-P | Philadelphia | 601,716,000 |
| 1981-D | Denver | 575,722,833 |
| 1981-S Proof | San Francisco | 4,063,083 |
| 1982-P | Philadelphia | 500,931,000 |
| 1982-D | Denver | 480,042,788 |
| 1982-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,857,479 |
| 1983-P | Philadelphia | 673,535,000 |
| 1983-D | Denver | 617,806,446 |
| 1983-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,279,126 |
| 1984-P | Philadelphia | 676,545,000 |
| 1984-D | Denver | 546,483,064 |
| 1984-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,065,110 |
| 1985-P | Philadelphia | 775,818,962 |
| 1985-D | Denver | 519,962,888 |
| 1985-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,362,821 |
| 1986-P | Philadelphia | 551,199,333 |
| 1986-D | Denver | 504,298,660 |
| 1986-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,010,497 |
| 1987-P | Philadelphia | 582,499,481 |
| 1987-D | Denver | 655,594,696 |
| 1987-S Proof | San Francisco | 4,227,728 |
| 1988-P | Philadelphia | 562,052,000 |
| 1988-D | Denver | 596,810,688 |
| 1988-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,262,948 |
| 1989-P | Philadelphia | 512,868,000 |
| 1989-D | Denver | 896,535,597 |
| 1989-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,220,194 |
| 1990-P | Philadelphia | 613,792,000 |
| 1990-D | Denver | 927,638,181 |
| 1990-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,299,559 |
| 1991-P | Philadelphia | 570,968,000 |
| 1991-D | Denver | 630,966,693 |
| 1991-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,867,787 |
| 1992-P | Philadelphia | 384,764,000 |
| 1992-D | Denver | 389,777,107 |
| 1992-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,858,981 |
| 1992-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,858,981 |
| 1992-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 1993-P | Philadelphia | 639,276,000 |
| 1993-D | Denver | 645,476,128 |
| 1993-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,633,439 |
| 1993-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,633,439 |
| 1993-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 1994-P | Philadelphia | 825,600,000 |
| 1994-D | Denver | 880,034,110 |
| 1994-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,484,594 |
| 1994-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,484,594 |
| 1994-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 1995-P | Philadelphia | 1,004,336,000 |
| 1995-D | Denver | 1,103,216,000 |
| 1995-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,117,496 |
| 1995-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,117,496 |
| 1995-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 1996-P | Philadelphia | 925,040,000 |
| 1996-D | Denver | 906,868,000 |
| 1996-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 1,750,244 |
| 1996-S Proof | San Francisco | 1,750,244 |
| 1996-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 1997-P | Philadelphia | 595,740,000 |
| 1997-D | Denver | 599,680,000 |
| 1997-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,055,000 |
| 1997-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,055,000 |
| 1997-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | — |
| 1998-P | Philadelphia | 896,268,000 |
| 1998-D | Denver | 821,000,000 |
| 1998-S Proof CLAD | San Francisco | 2,086,507 |
| 1998-S Proof SILVER | San Francisco | 878,792 |