The Lincoln Cent
1909–2025
The Lincoln cent carried more American history than any other coin, for the simple reason that it lasted longer and reached further than any other. Its portrait of Abraham Lincoln, first struck in 1909, is the longest-serving design in the history of United States coinage, and for most of the twentieth century the cent was the most common coin in the country — the piece everyone handled and spent without a thought. To follow it is to follow the ordinary money of American life across more than a century.
It began as a deliberate break with tradition. For its first hundred-odd years the United States had kept real people off its circulating coins, preferring allegorical figures of Liberty; the Lincoln cent ended that, putting an identifiable historical American on the nation's money for the first time. And it ended, as circulating money, with an equally deliberate act — the government's 2025 decision to stop making a coin that had come to cost several times its own value to produce.
Between those two decisions, the cent changed its reverse three times, changed its metal more than once, weathered a war and a design scandal, and became the subject of a long national argument about whether it was needed at all. Its history is the history of the smallest American coin, told across the longest span any of them ran.
Denomination 1¢ · Edge Plain · 387 coins
| Series | Designer | Years | Composition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln Wheat Cent | Victor David Brenner | 1909–1958 | 95% copper (bronze) |
| Lincoln Memorial Cent | Frank Gasparro (rev) | 1959–2008 | 95% copper -> 97.5% zinc (1982) |
| Lincoln Bicentennial Cent | Various (4 reverses) | 2009 | 97.5% zinc, copper plated |
| Lincoln Shield Cent | Lyndall Bass (rev) | 2010–2025 | 97.5% zinc, copper plated |
A president on a penny
The Lincoln cent was born of an anniversary. Nineteen-nine marked a hundred years since Abraham Lincoln's birth, and the occasion prompted a coin unlike any the country had circulated before: one bearing the portrait of a specific, named American. President Theodore Roosevelt, already pressing to make the nation's coinage more beautiful, backed the idea, and the sculptor Victor David Brenner supplied a dignified profile of Lincoln that has stayed on the obverse ever since. It was the first time a real historical figure, rather than a symbolic Liberty, appeared on a United States coin struck for circulation.
The coin's debut also produced an immediate controversy over three small letters. Brenner had placed his initials — V.D.B. — at the bottom of the reverse, an ordinary artist's signature, but on the coin of the common person it struck critics as crass self-promotion, and within days of the 1909 release the Mint halted production and scraped the initials from the dies. A small batch struck at San Francisco before the change became the series' most famous scarcity, a rarity created by an act of official embarrassment. The initials returned in 1918, shrunk almost to invisibility and tucked onto Lincoln's shoulder, where they have remained.
The wheat years
For its first half-century the cent wore Brenner's reverse of two curving ears of wheat, framing the words ONE CENT — a plain, agricultural emblem that gave the coin the name collectors still use, the "wheat penny." From 1909 to 1958 that design carried the cent through the defining decades of the American century, and the coin became a constant, unremarked witness to the era.
It passed through the breadlines of the Great Depression, when a single cent still bought something and small change genuinely mattered; it rode in the pockets of soldiers through two world wars; it accumulated by the billions in jars and drawers. The wheat cent is the most-produced coin in American history, and its commonness is the point — the money of everyday life for two generations, the coin that turned up most.
The war and the metal
The Second World War reached even into the composition of the cent. By 1943 copper was a critical war material, needed for shell casings and wiring and the machinery of a global conflict, and for that one year the Mint removed copper from the cent entirely, striking it instead in zinc-coated steel. The result was a pale, silvery coin that Americans found disconcerting — it was easily mistaken for a dime and prone to rust — a one-year wartime oddity born purely of necessity.
The changeover left one celebrated accident behind. A tiny number of leftover copper blanks from 1942 were struck with the 1943 date before the switch was complete, producing a copper cent that should not exist and became one of the most famous error coins in the country. It is the kind of mishap that only a coin made in the billions can generate — a stray survivor of a wartime metal shortage, hunted ever since.
Lincoln on both sides
In 1959, the hundred-and-fiftieth anniversary of Lincoln's birth, the cent's reverse changed for the first time. The wheat ears gave way to a depiction of the Lincoln Memorial by the Mint engraver Frank Gasparro — and the design produced a quiet curiosity, because the seated statue of Lincoln is visible between the memorial's columns. Lincoln now appeared on both faces of his own coin, in profile on the front and as a tiny statue on the back.
The Memorial reverse ran for half a century, and through it the Lincoln portrait on the obverse simply kept going, decade after decade, outlasting every other design in American coinage. By the time it passed a hundred years, Lincoln's profile had become the single most enduring image the Mint had ever struck — a face that stayed constant on the country's smallest coin while nearly everything else about the money changed around it.
From bronze to zinc
The cent's next transformation was economic rather than commemorative, and it foreshadowed the coin's eventual end. For most of its life the cent had been struck in bronze — mostly copper — but by the early 1980s copper had grown dear enough that the metal in a bronze cent threatened to exceed the cent itself. Faced with a coin that could no longer honestly contain its own value in copper, the Mint changed the recipe: from 1982 the cent was struck in zinc with only a thin copper plating, a coin that merely looked like copper.
The change was a turning point in what the cent was. The old principle that a coin should carry close to its face value in metal — the idea that had governed American copper since the founding, and that belongs to the story of the large cent — had already been abandoned in 1857; the 1982 switch was its final erasure on the cent, leaving a piece whose metal was frankly cheaper than its face. It kept the cent viable for another four decades, but it also made explicit what the coin had become: a token, held together by law rather than by the value of its material.
Two anniversaries and a shield
The cent's last design changes came together in 2009, a year that marked both the two-hundredth anniversary of Lincoln's birth and the hundredth of the coin itself. To commemorate it, the Mint issued four different reverse designs across the single year, each depicting a stage of Lincoln's life — his Kentucky birthplace, his formative years, his professional life in Illinois, and his presidency in Washington — turning the humble cent, briefly, into a four-part biography.
When the anniversary year ended, a permanent new reverse took over. From 2010 the cent carried a Union Shield, a thirteen-striped emblem of the states bound as one, designed to stand for Lincoln's preservation of the Union. That Shield cent was the coin's final circulating form, the design it wore from 2010 to the end, and the last chapter of a reverse that had begun with Brenner's wheat a century before.
The end of the cent
For decades a question had shadowed the coin: whether it should still be made at all. The cent bought less and less as prices rose, it accumulated unspent in jars rather than circulating, and — most damningly — it came to cost far more to produce than its face value, the cost of making one rising over the years to several times a single cent. A coin that costs the government multiples of its own value to manufacture, and that few people bother to spend, is a coin living on borrowed time, and the argument to end it grew steadily harder to answer.
The decision finally came in 2025. Early that year the administration directed the Treasury to stop making the cent, the Secretary of the Treasury determining that the coin was no longer necessary, and production was wound down over the year that followed. On the twelfth of November, 2025, the United States Mint struck its final circulating cent at Philadelphia in a ceremonial last strike, ending a run of the one-cent coin that stretched back some two hundred and thirty years. The Lincoln cent, after more than a century, had reached its close as everyday money.
What ended was production, not the coin's standing. The cent remains legal tender, and the billions already struck keep circulating and will for years; cash transactions are expected to round to the nearest five cents, by guidance and some state law rather than a national rule. A 2026 cent exists, but only for collectors — struck for the Mint's sets, not for circulation, and dual-dated for the nation's two hundred and fiftieth anniversary, a coda told with the semiquincentennial coinage. And the decision left a pointed irony behind it: with the cent gone, the smallest coin still made is the nickel, which costs close to fourteen cents to produce — even more, against its face, than the cent ever did.
Why it matters
The Lincoln cent matters as the coin that measured American life at its smallest denomination for longer than any other. It put the first real person on the nation's circulating money, and then it stayed — Lincoln's profile enduring across a hundred and sixteen years while the coin beneath it changed its reverse, its metal, and finally its very reason for being. No design in United States coinage lasted so long, and none passed through more hands.
Its ending is as telling as its beginning. The cent was born when a coin was expected to be both beautiful and honest in its metal, and it died a token — abandoned not because it lacked history but because it had become a small monument to inefficiency, costing several times its value to make and rarely spent when made. The coin that opened the era of real faces on American money also came to mark the moment the country decided its smallest coin was no longer justified. For a piece so ordinary that most people never looked at it twice, the Lincoln cent carried an extraordinary amount of the nation's story — from a president's centennial in 1909 to the quiet end of the penny in 2025.
Key dates
| Coin | Mintage |
|---|---|
| 1909-S Low-mintage first-year San Francisco issue without the VDB initials. | 1,825,000 |
| 1909-S — VDBvariety The iconic Lincoln cent key; only 484,000 struck. | 484,000 |
| 1914-D One of the major regular-issue Lincoln Wheat cent keys. | 1,193,000 |
| 1922 — No D (Strong Reverse)variety Famous Denver issue missing the visible D mintmark; traditionally treated as a major Lincoln key. | — |
| 1931-S Depression-era low-mintage issue and classic Wheat cent key. | 866,000 |
Better dates
| Coin | Mintage |
|---|---|
| 1909 — VDBvariety | 27,995,000 |
| 1910-S Early San Francisco issue with a relatively low mintage. | 6,045,000 |
| 1911-S Scarce early S-mint Wheat cent. | 4,026,000 |
| 1912-S Low-mintage San Francisco issue. | 4,431,000 |
| 1913-S Better early S-mint date. | 6,101,000 |
| 1914-S Scarcer companion to the major 1914-D key. | 4,137,000 |
| 1915-S Low-mintage early San Francisco Wheat cent. | 4,833,000 |
| 1924-D One of the tougher Denver issues of the 1920s. | 2,520,000 |
| 1926-S Low-mintage issue and an important semi-key, especially desirable in better condition. | 4,550,000 |
Key varieties
| Coin | Mintage |
|---|---|
| 1955 — Doubled Die Obverse | — |
| 1972 — Doubled Die Obverse | — |
Every Lincoln Cent
Every coin links to its own page — full specifications and, where market listings have been observed, a grade-by-grade price guide.
Lincoln Wheat Cent
| Coin | Mint | Mintage |
|---|---|---|
| 1909 | Philadelphia | 72,702,618 |
| 1909 — VDB | Philadelphia | 27,995,000 |
| 1909 Proof LINCOLN | Philadelphia | 2,618 |
| 1909 Proof VDB | Philadelphia | 1,194 |
| 1909-S | San Francisco | 1,825,000 |
| 1909-S — VDB | San Francisco | 484,000 |
| 1910 | Philadelphia | 146,801,218 |
| 1910 Proof | Philadelphia | 4,118 |
| 1910-S | San Francisco | 6,045,000 |
| 1911 | Philadelphia | 101,177,787 |
| 1911 Proof | Philadelphia | 1,725 |
| 1911-D | Denver | 12,672,000 |
| 1911-S | San Francisco | 4,026,000 |
| 1912 | Philadelphia | 68,153,060 |
| 1912 Proof | Philadelphia | 2,172 |
| 1912-D | Denver | 10,411,000 |
| 1912-S | San Francisco | 4,431,000 |
| 1913 | Philadelphia | 76,532,352 |
| 1913 Proof | Philadelphia | 2,983 |
| 1913-D | Denver | 15,804,000 |
| 1913-S | San Francisco | 6,101,000 |
| 1914 | Philadelphia | 75,238,432 |
| 1914 Proof | Philadelphia | — |
| 1914-D | Denver | 1,193,000 |
| 1914-S | San Francisco | 4,137,000 |
| 1915 | Philadelphia | 29,092,120 |
| 1915 Proof | Philadelphia | 1,150 |
| 1915-D | Denver | 22,050,000 |
| 1915-S | San Francisco | 4,833,000 |
| 1916 | Philadelphia | 131,833,677 |
| 1916 Proof | Philadelphia | 600 |
| 1916-D | Denver | 35,956,000 |
| 1916-S | San Francisco | 22,510,000 |
| 1917 | Philadelphia | 196,429,785 |
| 1917-D | Denver | 55,120,000 |
| 1917-S | San Francisco | 32,620,000 |
| 1918 | Philadelphia | 288,104,634 |
| 1918-D | Denver | 47,830,000 |
| 1918-S | San Francisco | 34,680,000 |
| 1919 | Philadelphia | 392,021,000 |
| 1919-D | Denver | 57,154,000 |
| 1919-S | San Francisco | 139,760,000 |
| 1920 | Philadelphia | 310,165,000 |
| 1920-D | Denver | 49,280,000 |
| 1920-S | San Francisco | 46,220,000 |
| 1921 | Philadelphia | 39,157,000 |
| 1921-S | San Francisco | 15,274,000 |
| 1922-D | Denver | 7,160,000 |
| 1922 — No D (Strong Reverse) | Philadelphia | — |
| 1923 | Philadelphia | 74,723,000 |
| 1923-S | San Francisco | 8,700,000 |
| 1924 | Philadelphia | 75,178,000 |
| 1924-D | Denver | 2,520,000 |
| 1924-S | San Francisco | 11,696,000 |
| 1925 | Philadelphia | 139,949,000 |
| 1925-D | Denver | 22,580,000 |
| 1925-S | San Francisco | 26,380,000 |
| 1926 | Philadelphia | 157,088,000 |
| 1926-D | Denver | 28,020,000 |
| 1926-S | San Francisco | 4,550,000 |
| 1927 | Philadelphia | 144,440,000 |
| 1927-D | Denver | 27,170,000 |
| 1927-S | San Francisco | 14,276,000 |
| 1928 | Philadelphia | 134,116,000 |
| 1928-D | Denver | 31,170,000 |
| 1928-S | San Francisco | 17,266,000 |
| 1929 | Philadelphia | 185,262,000 |
| 1929-D | Denver | 41,730,000 |
| 1929-S | San Francisco | 50,148,000 |
| 1930 | Philadelphia | 157,415,000 |
| 1930-D | Denver | 40,100,000 |
| 1930-S | San Francisco | 24,286,000 |
| 1931 | Philadelphia | 19,396,000 |
| 1931-D | Denver | 4,480,000 |
| 1931-S | San Francisco | 866,000 |
| 1932 | Philadelphia | 9,062,000 |
| 1932-D | Denver | 10,500,000 |
| 1933 | Philadelphia | 14,360,000 |
| 1933-D | Denver | 6,200,000 |
| 1934 | Philadelphia | 219,080,000 |
| 1934-D | Denver | 28,446,000 |
| 1935 | Philadelphia | 245,388,000 |
| 1935-D | Denver | 47,000,000 |
| 1935-S | San Francisco | 38,702,000 |
| 1936 | Philadelphia | 309,632,000 |
| 1936 Proof | Philadelphia | — |
| 1936-D | Denver | 40,620,000 |
| 1936-S | San Francisco | 29,130,000 |
| 1937 | Philadelphia | 309,170,000 |
| 1937 Proof | Philadelphia | 9,320 |
| 1937-D | Denver | 50,430,000 |
| 1937-S | San Francisco | 34,500,000 |
| 1938 | Philadelphia | 156,682,000 |
| 1938 Proof | Philadelphia | 14,734 |
| 1938-D | Denver | 20,010,000 |
| 1938-S | San Francisco | 15,180,000 |
| 1939 | Philadelphia | 316,466,000 |
| 1939 Proof | Philadelphia | 13,520 |
| 1939-D | Denver | 15,160,000 |
| 1939-S | San Francisco | 52,070,000 |
| 1940 | Philadelphia | 586,810,000 |
| 1940 Proof | Philadelphia | 15,872 |
| 1940-D | Denver | 81,390,000 |
| 1940-S | San Francisco | 112,940,000 |
| 1941 | Philadelphia | 887,018,000 |
| 1941 Proof | Philadelphia | 21,100 |
| 1941-D | Denver | 128,700,000 |
| 1941-S | San Francisco | 92,360,000 |
| 1942 | Philadelphia | 657,796,000 |
| 1942 Proof | Philadelphia | 32,600 |
| 1942-D | Denver | 206,698,000 |
| 1942-S | San Francisco | 85,590,000 |
| 1943 | Philadelphia | 684,628,670 |
| 1943-D | Denver | 217,660,000 |
| 1943-S | San Francisco | 191,550,000 |
| 1944 | Philadelphia | 1,435,400,000 |
| 1944-D | Denver | 430,578,000 |
| 1944-S | San Francisco | 282,760,000 |
| 1945 | Philadelphia | 1,040,515,000 |
| 1945-D | Denver | 266,268,000 |
| 1945-S | San Francisco | 181,770,000 |
| 1946 | Philadelphia | 991,655,000 |
| 1946-D | Denver | 315,690,000 |
| 1946-S | San Francisco | 198,100,000 |
| 1947 | Philadelphia | 190,555,000 |
| 1947-D | Denver | 194,750,000 |
| 1947-S | San Francisco | 99,000,000 |
| 1948 | Philadelphia | 317,570,000 |
| 1948-D | Denver | 172,637,500 |
| 1948-S | San Francisco | 81,735,000 |
| 1949 | Philadelphia | 217,775,000 |
| 1949-D | Denver | 153,132,500 |
| 1949-S | San Francisco | 64,290,000 |
| 1950 | Philadelphia | 272,635,000 |
| 1950 Proof | Philadelphia | 51,386 |
| 1950-D | Denver | 334,950,000 |
| 1950-S | San Francisco | 118,505,000 |
| 1951 | Philadelphia | 284,576,000 |
| 1951 Proof | Philadelphia | 57,500 |
| 1951-D | Denver | 625,355,000 |
| 1951-S | San Francisco | 136,010,000 |
| 1952 | Philadelphia | 186,775,000 |
| 1952 Proof | Philadelphia | 81,980 |
| 1952-D | Denver | 746,130,000 |
| 1952-S | San Francisco | 137,800,004 |
| 1953 | Philadelphia | 256,755,000 |
| 1953 Proof | Philadelphia | 128,800 |
| 1953-D | Denver | 700,515,000 |
| 1953-S | San Francisco | 181,835,000 |
| 1954 | Philadelphia | 71,640,050 |
| 1954 Proof | Philadelphia | 233,300 |
| 1954-D | Denver | 251,552,500 |
| 1954-S | San Francisco | 96,190,000 |
| 1955 — Doubled Die Obverse | Philadelphia | — |
| 1955 | Philadelphia | 330,958,200 |
| 1955 Proof | Philadelphia | 378,200 |
| 1955-D | Denver | 563,257,500 |
| 1955-S | San Francisco | 44,610,000 |
| 1956 | Philadelphia | 420,745,000 |
| 1956 Proof | Philadelphia | 669,384 |
| 1956-D | Denver | 1,098,201,100 |
| 1957 | Philadelphia | 282,540,000 |
| 1957 Proof | Philadelphia | 1,247,952 |
| 1957-D | Denver | 1,051,342,000 |
| 1958 | Philadelphia | 252,525,000 |
| 1958 Proof | Philadelphia | 875,652 |
| 1958-D | Denver | 800,953,300 |
Lincoln Memorial Cent
| Coin | Mint | Mintage |
|---|---|---|
| 1959 | Philadelphia | 609,715,000 |
| 1959 Proof | Philadelphia | — |
| 1959-D | Denver | 1,279,760,000 |
| 1960 | Philadelphia | 586,405,000 |
| 1960 Proof LARGE DATE | Philadelphia | — |
| 1960 Proof | Philadelphia | — |
| 1960 Proof SMALL DATE | Philadelphia | — |
| 1960-D | Denver | 1,580,884,000 |
| 1961 | Philadelphia | 753,345,000 |
| 1961 Proof | Philadelphia | 3,028,244 |
| 1961-D | Denver | 1,753,266,700 |
| 1962 | Philadelphia | 606,045,000 |
| 1962 Proof | Philadelphia | — |
| 1962-D | Denver | 1,793,148,140 |
| 1963 | Philadelphia | 754,110,000 |
| 1963 Proof | Philadelphia | — |
| 1963-D | Denver | 1,774,020,400 |
| 1964 | Philadelphia | 2,648,575,000 |
| 1964 Proof | Philadelphia | — |
| 1964-D | Denver | 3,799,071,500 |
| 1965 | Philadelphia | 1,497,224,900 |
| 1966 | Philadelphia | 2,188,147,783 |
| 1967 | Philadelphia | 3,048,667,100 |
| 1968 | Philadelphia | 1,707,880,970 |
| 1968-D | Denver | 2,886,269,600 |
| 1968-S | San Francisco | 258,270,001 |
| 1968-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,041,506 |
| 1969 | Philadelphia | 1,136,910,000 |
| 1969-D | Denver | 4,002,832,200 |
| 1969-S | San Francisco | 544,375,000 |
| 1969-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1970 | Philadelphia | 1,898,315,000 |
| 1970-D | Denver | 2,891,438,900 |
| 1970-S | San Francisco | 690,560,004 |
| 1970-S Proof DDO SMALL DATE VP-004 | San Francisco | — |
| 1970-S Proof LARGE DATE | San Francisco | — |
| 1970-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1970-S Proof SMALL DATE | San Francisco | — |
| 1971 | Philadelphia | 1,919,490,000 |
| 1971-D | Denver | 2,911,045,600 |
| 1971-S | San Francisco | 525,133,459 |
| 1971-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1972 — Doubled Die Obverse | Philadelphia | — |
| 1972 | Philadelphia | 2,933,255,000 |
| 1972-D | Denver | 2,665,071,400 |
| 1972-S | San Francisco | 376,939,108 |
| 1972-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,260,996 |
| 1973 | Philadelphia | 3,728,245,000 |
| 1973-D | Denver | 3,549,576,588 |
| 1973-S | San Francisco | 317,177,295 |
| 1973-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1974 | Philadelphia | 4,232,140,523 |
| 1974-D | Denver | 4,235,098,000 |
| 1974-S | San Francisco | 409,426,660 |
| 1974-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1975 | Philadelphia | 5,451,476,142 |
| 1975-D | Denver | 4,505,275,300 |
| 1975-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1976 | Philadelphia | 4,674,292,426 |
| 1976-D | Denver | 4,221,592,455 |
| 1976-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1977 | Philadelphia | 4,469,930,000 |
| 1977-D | Denver | 4,194,062,300 |
| 1977-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,251,152 |
| 1978 | Philadelphia | 5,558,605,000 |
| 1978-D | Denver | 4,280,233,400 |
| 1978-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1979 | Philadelphia | 6,018,515,000 |
| 1979-D | Denver | 4,139,357,254 |
| 1979-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1980 | Philadelphia | 7,414,705,000 |
| 1980-D | Denver | 5,140,098,660 |
| 1980-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1981 | Philadelphia | 7,491,750,000 |
| 1981-D | Denver | 5,373,235,677 |
| 1981-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 1982 | Philadelphia | 10,712,525,000 |
| 1982-D | Denver | 6,012,979,368 |
| 1982-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,857,479 |
| 1983 | Philadelphia | 7,752,355,000 |
| 1983-D | Denver | 6,467,199,428 |
| 1983-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,279,126 |
| 1984 | Philadelphia | 8,151,079,000 |
| 1984-D | Denver | 5,569,238,906 |
| 1984-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,065,110 |
| 1985 | Philadelphia | 5,648,489,887 |
| 1985-D | Denver | 5,287,339,926 |
| 1985-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,362,821 |
| 1986 | Philadelphia | 4,491,395,493 |
| 1986-D | Denver | 4,442,866,698 |
| 1986-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,010,497 |
| 1987 | Philadelphia | 4,682,466,931 |
| 1987-D | Denver | 4,879,389,514 |
| 1987-S Proof | San Francisco | 4,227,728 |
| 1988 | Philadelphia | 6,092,810,000 |
| 1988-D | Denver | 5,253,740,443 |
| 1988-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,262,948 |
| 1989 | Philadelphia | 7,261,535,000 |
| 1989-D | Denver | 5,345,467,111 |
| 1989-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,220,194 |
| 1990 | Philadelphia | 6,851,765,000 |
| 1990-D | Denver | 4,922,894,533 |
| 1990-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,299,559 |
| 1991 | Philadelphia | 5,165,940,000 |
| 1991-D | Denver | 4,158,446,076 |
| 1991-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,867,787 |
| 1992 | Philadelphia | 4,648,905,000 |
| 1992-D | Denver | 4,448,673,300 |
| 1992-S Proof | San Francisco | 4,176,560 |
| 1993 | Philadelphia | 5,684,705,000 |
| 1993-D | Denver | 6,426,650,571 |
| 1993-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,394,792 |
| 1994 | Philadelphia | 6,500,850,000 |
| 1994-D | Denver | 7,131,765,000 |
| 1994-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,269,923 |
| 1995 | Philadelphia | 6,411,440,000 |
| 1995-D | Denver | 7,128,560,000 |
| 1995-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,797,481 |
| 1996 | Philadelphia | 6,612,465,000 |
| 1996-D | Denver | 6,510,795,000 |
| 1996-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,525,265 |
| 1997 | Philadelphia | 4,622,800,000 |
| 1997-D | Denver | 4,576,555,000 |
| 1997-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,796,678 |
| 1998 | Philadelphia | 5,032,155,000 |
| 1998-D | Denver | 5,225,353,500 |
| 1998-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,086,507 |
| 1999 | Philadelphia | 5,237,600,000 |
| 1999-D | Denver | 6,360,065,000 |
| 1999-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,347,966 |
| 2000 | Philadelphia | 5,503,200,000 |
| 2000-D | Denver | 8,774,220,000 |
| 2000-S Proof | San Francisco | 4,047,993 |
| 2001 | Philadelphia | 4,959,600,000 |
| 2001-D | Denver | 5,374,990,000 |
| 2001-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,184,606 |
| 2002 | Philadelphia | 3,260,800,000 |
| 2002-D | Denver | 4,028,055,000 |
| 2002-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,211,995 |
| 2003 | Philadelphia | 3,300,000,000 |
| 2003-D | Denver | 3,548,000,000 |
| 2003-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,298,439 |
| 2004 | Philadelphia | 3,379,600,000 |
| 2004-D | Denver | 3,456,400,000 |
| 2004-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,965,422 |
| 2005 | Philadelphia | 3,935,600,000 |
| 2005-D | Denver | 3,764,450,500 |
| 2005-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,344,679 |
| 2006 | Philadelphia | 4,290,000,000 |
| 2006-D | Denver | 3,944,000,000 |
| 2006-S Proof | San Francisco | 3,054,436 |
| 2007 | Philadelphia | 3,613,000,600 |
| 2007-D | Denver | 3,524,000,400 |
| 2007-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,062,793 |
| 2008 | Philadelphia | 2,569,600,000 |
| 2008-D | Denver | 2,849,600,000 |
| 2008-S Proof | San Francisco | 2,169,561 |
Lincoln Bicentennial Cent
| Coin | Mint | Mintage |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 — BIRTH & CHILDHOOD | Philadelphia | — |
| 2009 — FORMATIVE YEARS | Philadelphia | 376,000,000 |
| 2009 — PRESIDENCY | Philadelphia | 129,600,000 |
| 2009 — PROFESSIONAL LIFE | Philadelphia | — |
| 2009-D — BIRTH & CHILDHOOD | Denver | 350,400,000 |
| 2009-D — FORMATIVE YEARS | Denver | 363,600,000 |
| 2009-D — PRESIDENCY | Denver | 198,000,000 |
| 2009-D — PROFESSIONAL LIFE | Denver | — |
| 2009-S Proof BRONZE BIRTH & CHILDHOOD | San Francisco | 2,995,615 |
| 2009-S Proof BRONZE FORMATIVE YEARS | San Francisco | 2,995,615 |
| 2009-S Proof BRONZE PRESIDENCY | San Francisco | 2,995,615 |
| 2009-S Proof BRONZE PROFESSIONAL LIFE | San Francisco | 2,995,615 |
Lincoln Shield Cent
| Coin | Mint | Mintage |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Philadelphia | 1,963,630,000 |
| 2010-D | Denver | 2,047,200,000 |
| 2010-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2011 | Philadelphia | 2,402,400,000 |
| 2011-D | Denver | 2,536,140,000 |
| 2011-S Proof | San Francisco | 1,673,010 |
| 2012 | Philadelphia | 3,132,000,000 |
| 2012-D | Denver | 2,883,200,000 |
| 2012-S Proof | San Francisco | 1,237,415 |
| 2013 | Philadelphia | 3,750,400,000 |
| 2013-D | Denver | 3,319,600,000 |
| 2013-S Proof | San Francisco | 1,237,926 |
| 2014 | Philadelphia | 3,990,800,000 |
| 2014-D | Denver | 4,155,600,000 |
| 2014-S Proof | San Francisco | 1,190,369 |
| 2015 | Philadelphia | 4,691,300,000 |
| 2015-D | Denver | 4,674,000,000 |
| 2015-S Proof | San Francisco | 1,022,410 |
| 2016 | Philadelphia | 4,698,000,000 |
| 2016-D | Denver | 4,420,400,000 |
| 2016-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2017 | Philadelphia | 4,361,220,000 |
| 2017-D | Denver | 4,272,800,000 |
| 2017-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2018 | Philadelphia | 4,066,800,000 |
| 2018-D | Denver | 3,736,400,000 |
| 2018-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2019 | Philadelphia | 3,542,800,000 |
| 2019-W Uncirculated | West Point | 318,695 |
| 2019-W Proof | West Point | — |
| 2019-W Reverse Proof | West Point | — |
| 2019-D | Denver | 3,497,600,000 |
| 2019-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2020 | Philadelphia | 3,560,800,000 |
| 2020-D | Denver | 4,035,600,000 |
| 2020-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2021 | Philadelphia | 3,925,820,000 |
| 2021-D | Denver | 3,982,800,000 |
| 2021-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2022 | Philadelphia | 3,129,200,000 |
| 2022-D | Denver | 3,230,400,000 |
| 2022-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2023 | Philadelphia | 2,262,000,000 |
| 2023-D | Denver | 2,260,800,000 |
| 2023-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2024 | Philadelphia | 1,712,000,000 |
| 2024-D | Denver | 1,513,200,000 |
| 2024-S Proof | San Francisco | — |
| 2025 | Philadelphia | 655,200,000 |
| 2025-D | Denver | 645,200,000 |
| 2025-S Proof | San Francisco | — |